Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture

Steven Clarke, DC
November 9, 2021

Reading time: 4 minutes

Man suffering from pain in spine.


Patient sued defendant chiropractor after patient presented for mid back pain and spasms lasting several weeks. Patient claims that chiropractor caused vertebral fracture of an osteoporotic T7-T8 vertebra, causing the condition to worsen, requiring vertebroplasty. Patient states she is now in continued pain and spasms with difficulty sitting. Patient also sued her family physician and a second chiropractor that she had seen subsequently.

Case Description

The patient, a 48-year-old female computer programmer, presented to the chiropractic office of Dr. J with generalized mid back pain at lower level of shoulder blades that bothers her mostly during the latter part of the day. Occasionally, deep inhalation will aggravate the pain as well. NSAIDS, heating pad and massages afforded no relief. The patient had been on low-level corticosteroids for rheumatoid arthritis as well as prior parathyroid gland removal for a cancerous lesion. Prior to presenting to Dr. J’s office, the patient had been physically fit, doing yoga twice a week as well as taking daily walks during her work lunch break. The patient states that after being treated by Dr. J she is now limited in her daily activities and has great difficulty performing her typical work duties.

The patient indicates that on her third visit to the chiropractor’s office Dr. J pushed on her mid back while she was lying on her stomach. She stated that she felt sharp pain and spasms, yelled out in pain and then had difficulty taking a deep breath. According to the patient, Dr. J placed a cold pack on the area with TENS, telling her that it was a deep spasm and the therapy would relieve some of the pain and spasms. The pain continued to be constant and so the patient went to her family doctor, Dr. M, who prescribed her muscle relaxants. However, the pain still continued so she saw another chiropractor, Dr. H, who referred her for an MRI of the thoracic spine revealing end plate fractures of the T7 and T8 vertebrae with low T score, relating to osteoporosis. Dr. H then referred her to a spine orthopedic, who performed successful vertebroplasty on the two levels.

In the case against Dr. J, he stated that the patient signed an informed consent form on her first visit which he had in his file. He also stated that he did perform a history in which the patient told him of her rheumatoid arthritis history, which he noted. He indicated that he was gentle in his diversified treatment, applying heat and massaging the area prior to gently manipulating the mid back. Dr. J felt that the patient had experienced ”deep spasms” after the treatment and that the subluxation needed to be reduced to improve function and ranges of motion.

Contributing Risk Factors

  • Corticosteroid use for Rheumatoid Arthritis 
  • Parathyroid gland removal (calcium metabolism) 
  • Possible age-related osteoporosis 
  • Various types of manipulation have different possible risk factors 


The case went to trial where the patient was awarded over $200,000 by jury verdict. The jury ruled Dr. J to be guilty of deviating from the standard of care by not performing a more thorough prior health history which would have revealed the corticosteroid use that is commonly associated with causing osteoporosis. Additionally, while Dr. J had the patient sign a consent form on her first visit, the trial revealed that he did not fully discuss the range of side effects that might be possible with chiropractic treatment.

The family physician, Dr. M, was also sued for not performing any informed consent and not properly referring the patient immediately for diagnostic studies to further evaluate the patient’s condition. Amount of settlement in Dr. M’s case was not disclosed. The case against the second chiropractor, Dr. H, was dismissed with no cause.


Malpractice litigation is a systematic process whereby chiropractic care is examined to determine whether the appropriate standard of care was met, and if not, whether the failure resulted in a compensable injury to the patient. Using hindsight and risk tools, we can identify some practices Dr. J might have done differently in order to avoid inappropriate treatment.

– Patient’s Full History

The importance of a complete and accurate health history as well as medication history, cannot be overemphasized. Unfortunately, in many chiropractic practices, the completed history form receives a cursory review by the chiropractor — if nothing ”jumps out,” the chiropractor might proceed with examination and treatment.

– Proper Informed Consent

The second liability concern in this case relates to informed consent to treat. Informed consent often is misunderstood as a legal form that must be completed before a doctor can provide care. In actuality, informed consent is an educational process undertaken to ensure that the patient has sufficient information to reasonably decide on one of the proposed treatment options. If the patient is properly informed of his or her condition, the recommended treatment, the possible benefits of the treatment, the reasonable alternatives including not moving forward with treatment, as well as the risks, then he or she can make an informed decision.

Additional Claims content


Your job as a chiropractor carries unique risks that can leave you susceptible to malpractice claims. In this article, we’ll…


In this article, chiropractors will be introduced to the malpractice claims process. Learning about malpractice claims ahead of time can…


In this article, chiropractors will learn what they should do (and not do) if they are sued by a patient…

This document should not be construed as legal or medical advice and should not be construed as rules or establishing a standard of care. Because the facts applicable to your situation may vary, or the laws applicable in your jurisdiction may differ, please contact your attorney or other professional advisors if you have any questions related to your legal or medical obligations or rights, state or federal laws, contract interpretation, or other legal questions.

MedPro Group is the marketing name used to refer to the insurance operations of The Medical Protective Company, Princeton Insurance Company, PLICO, Inc. and MedPro RRG Risk Retention Group. All insurance products are underwritten and administered by these and other Berkshire Hathaway affiliates, including National Fire & Marine Insurance Company. Product availability is based upon business and/or regulatory approval and may differ among companies.

© MedPro Group Inc. All rights reserved.